Hypothesis on time

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Hypothesis on time

Hypothesis on time

Ex nihilo nihil

Some words about time

It is a long time ago, I had dreamed of another world, a world where time would be perfect, where time would belong to us. Each one it his at the time, for the one day old child, the day would be its life, the year the infinite one ; for the adult the day would be the moment, the year less and less, until with this which resembles that of front, until with almost nothing. Balance death would be only the end of a
tiring repetition. If it is not this paradox who pushes the moment with a new
life, a new eternity for each experiment, and which hangs up again us with the life, with its richnesses whatever the moment and the age time

Three time

In ninety three, I had a physical system to analyse. I thus sat down at the edge of water and I observed what I saw and mesured was astonishing and in particular, which relates to time. I saw that matter attracts the matter, and if this one has a direction, the attracted matter will take it even smell, to some extent it was it
even principle which wants
to think
with acts

I continued the observation and I saw that swirls were formed with the feet of the sluice valves. I saw that a phenomenon, could involve another phenomenon much more powerful, a little as in a pan of water, if you make turn the object by accompanying it, therefore while imposing, this one will go at the speed of your handle, but if you give some small impulse, it will create for itself a swirl a speed tending towards the infinite one. It is still the same principe used by Homere to teach the matter and Saint Exupery, the spirit. They do not dictate, it propose ideas which accelerate the spirit, this stimulated spirit of small impulses,creates many other ideas much more powerful, particular to each one

You know in summer, one likes yourselves

at the edge of water, also I continued the observation, and I found the key
which enable me to analyse this channel, thing that nobody had stated to know
to make. What I observed, it is that each thing is analysable only one
compared to itself, thus the lines of the fluids have their own lives, in
fact these principles physical were analysable only compared to themselves in
an exponential way, I could only lean me on my perception ; over

Time of the event,

we were still in the first days of my training course, however the first contact were taken, I had posed my marks, the event already was finished, thus I recognized the time of the event, the time which makes that each new experiment tends towards the infinite one in the first moment, for stabilized in the death of a repetition. These event which starts of the balance towrds another which forgot only with the next event, if ever.

The concept was not long in developing,
and revealed an

individual time

which was particular for me, in connection with my age, idem for these young secretaries or this benevolent manager. Each one it his at the time locates lived moment, at ten years I look myself like Marcel Pagnol using the eyes of a ten years old child, but at thirty years, I look myself using the eyes of this thirty years old man.

Social time

this common time which marks the appointment was present like an ogre, but the physical sysrems erased it whili smiling, making the stop watch creasy from its operation. This social time, son of the planets, who brings the second quite useless dimension to the time of the event in the equations, is rejected because time is the variation of the studied system and represents itself only on one dimension.

I had carried out the objective, then I continued to observe, and I saw that the some
either way traversed by water, it always arose by the same sluice valves, like the light during the lesson on the interferences, or like x-rays, thus the some or way traversed, the thoughts of the large philosophers are found at the same point, the difference is the manner, the borrowed way.

This history of time seems to me extraordinary of share the many applications, then I still offer myself a little observations, and I refine the second principle in a new principle separating the laws from operation, the laws of globality being completely different and independent of the laws of the characteristics which one create. The fifth law is the part placed between bracket in the second law: " I saw that a phenomenon, (with the particular laws) could involve another phenomenon much more powerful (governs by new laws.)"In example without sharp angle, O and O and O associated a figure gives to the new laws or three sharp angles appear.

Structure of the site

A. Demonstration of the fact that the time is exponential in mechanics of the fluids. Details from the original text.

B Demonstration on curves defined as impossible to represent arithmetically; generalization of exponential time in science. Example from biologie

C Value of the demonstration: philosophy of the hypothesis.

D. Logical development and relations between mathematics, physical or biological science and philosophy: to gain a better understanding of the site

E Search of examples and definitions, other pages.

F. Coherence: Paul Janet.

Favour concept suggested

The concept allows:

A) To define a method

of simplified analysis of the experimental curves and to identify the number of factors influencing the analyzed curves

B) To determine a number without dimension

which will be characteristic of each one of these factors and which will be found in the other analyses making to intervene these factors

C) to forget the concept of quantity

which is one of the great problems of modern biochemistry, because the purified products are expensive and sometimes even rare.

D) To pass from an analysis on two dimensions to an analysis on one

because the base of time is considered, in the method, as being the variation itself. This simplifies calculations argely.

E) to use a simple method,

accessible to all without having to make calls with the complex mechanisms of the regulation by using a method of bringing together of the intervals and identification of the shape of curves to identify the measured or analyzed phenomena.

Applications over time to develop:

The Applications over time to develop:
a): An application software of biological time. In other words a software which makes it possible to know the real age of our body in opposition to an age measured using a social time.

b): The development of a mechanism, which can be electronic, to measure in an
exponential way the physical systems. The characteristic of this apparatus
will be to emphasize the linear progressions, since the exponential
correction will be made over time.

c): The development of tables emphasizing the characteristic of each
phenomenon. In example, in biology, each enzyme could be identified using a
number without dimension. Characteristic of an analysis with an exponential


The term is one of the keys which allows the reasoning. Without symbolization, impossible to put information in memory, impossible to perceive time, because time is variation, time is phenomenon. This induces that our reason uses the term and its laws to perceive the world. The term by effect becomes our size and our weakness, size by creating the communication with oneself and others, weakness by creating the dogmas and by deforming the concepts which it represents. This way, when I seek the limits of the reasoning I can see three principles : The first principle of Bossuet which says that a term can represent only one concept. The second principle of Cousin who says that each term changes direction according to knowledge of the moment. And the third principle which I propose who say that the term deforms the concept which it represents, or that modeling always restrictive and is directed according to perception, and by the same one destroys the concept. Thus the credibility of the term will have to never exceed 63% of its optimal value, which we can name dogma. This value of 63% results from the form credibility = dogma (1-exp(-v/jo)) with "v" being a variable and jo the number characteristic of the reason. In other words, our force is not in the purity or in the accuracy of a concept, our force is in the variation which born of plurality. Our force is the archivist who plays and evolves at the same time as it classifies the new concepts, at the same time as it studies those which marry between them, variations always as strong as it evolves, that it saw. The force is in the men in one, which create and not in a dogma that a man or a concept represents. Thus the man is movement, the man is variation, as well in his body, in his ideas. The form of these variations (the form of time) justified these writings and those which follow. To die, it is right to stop thinking, dying it is right to be subjected to only one idea. In other words still each science approached revival the ideas, starts again the movement, starts again the life, knowledge never to listen itself or to follow the idea until the dogma is art to evolve. To start again unceasingly on the bases leading to death, useful one moment, morbid too a long time, the concepts live only when they are moving. Man concept you described here, before any action, first is to remain alive.

Before philosophy of the hypothesis

Since the philosophy is the research of the first causes and the first
principles; and since the first principle of any reasoning is the identity
principle, more known under the name of "omne subjectum est proedicatum sui",
the principle of the fact that an identity cannot vary in the reasoning; and
since the zero still means nothing by definition. I do not think that the
zero can have other meaning than nothing. In other words we cannot use the
zero in a representation or analyzes physical modelling matter ; because
even if this matter changed form through the filter of our perception,
nothing enables us to say that it does not exist any more. I think that to
believe it or write it using the zero is an error. Andre

I propose to approach the analysis of the systems
using a state of order. In other words, to observe the state of the matter
between two forms, or in other
words to take a reference which would be the
final state, and a source which would be the most disordered state or initial
state, having for value "1". In this scale we can find all the states of
order, (according to the subject, analyzed characteristic), the shapes or
combinations of the matter. Andre p.j.

The philosopher Paul Janet knew how to describe it, in the years 1800, (there
are philosophies peculiar to sciences). The regrouping of these philosophies
to which we add the philosophy of philosophies, the noblest, forms philosophy
in general.

From this, I think that it is possible to admit that there are several types
of logic. That one which we use is the logic of exchange, or commercial
logic, so I call it the time of the trade.

On the contrary, I think that we can, and that we must use in hard science
another logic, which I call the time of sciences.

To be able to prove it, I return first to the expression "Ex nihilo nihil".
This expression, which means "nothing comes from nothing", is the quotation
of the ancients for Ancient Greek philosophers. But it results, that in
nature nothing comes from zero, or zero can describe nothing, or even zero
does not exist. An iota yes, but not the zero.

More recently Antoine Laurent de Lavoisier, father of modern chemistry, wrote
his law "nothing is lost, nothing is created", which repeats in the branches
of hard sciences the expression “Ex nihilo nihil”.

These elements allow us to say that the zero does not exist in hard science
and in fact incited me to seek a mathematical model where the zero does not

Development of the hypothesis on time.

a) We have the things or matter, and the phenomena. The principal difference
between the two concepts lies in the fact that the one persists and the other
is an image, which appears or disappears, because a phenomenon needs a thing
to appear. From these considerations the time is a phenomenon.

b) One hour for a ten-hour-old child constitutes one tenth of its life,
whereas one hour for a seventy-two-year-old person does certainly not
represent the same proportion.

c). This results in the fact that more we benefit from time, more we have new
experiences; more we have the impression to be short of time to analyze the
events. Therefore more the value of one second is important, more time seems
to us short; that is the paradox.

Andre pierre jocelyn webmaster and author